Lilli Tagger vs Alice Rame Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Sep at 03:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Tagger vs A. Rame

AUT
2
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tagger 2 - 0 Rame
They have played 4 sets in total, with Lilli Tagger winning 4 and Alice Rame winning 0. The last match between Lilli Tagger and Alice Rame was at the W75 Vienna, 05-09-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Lilli Tagger getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tagger | 2 |
| Rame | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(QF) W75 Vienna(09-05-25)
(QF) W35 Terrassa(03-27-25)
L. Tagger vs A. Rame H2H Profile
L. Tagger vs A. Rame Match Preview:
- When it comes to winning points on their second serve in recent matches, Tagger leads slightly with 37.98% compared to Rame's 37.4%. Could this minor advantage be pivotal?
- Rame shows a stronger performance in return games, winning 49.51% of opponents' second serve points against Tagger's 47.05%. In first serve returns, Rame is ahead with 35.55% over Tagger's 30.42%.
- Under pressure, Tagger excels slightly by saving 48.3% of breakpoints, while Rame saves 44.43%. Will this give Tagger an edge in crucial moments?
- Overall match performance in the past year shows Tagger with a higher win rate of 72.09% compared to Rame's 66.28%.
- Both players perform best on clay, but Tagger holds a slightly better career win percentage of 65% against Rame's 62%.
- On the indoor hard surface, both players share a win percentage of 50%.
- In Challengers/ITF tournaments over the past year, Tagger boasts a superior win percentage with 77.14% compared to Rame's 65.85%.
- Rame has competed against opponents with an average rank of 348.93, while Tagger's opponents had a lower average rank of 296.44.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Rame might have the upper hand, having won 72% of deciding sets in the last year versus Tagger's 55% success rate.
- Rame is more efficient in converting break points, with a conversion rate of 44.82%, significantly higher than Tagger's 28.97%.
Editorial Prediction (September 5, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match between Rame and Tagger presents an intriguing contest, as both players exhibit unique strengths and capabilities. While Tagger has a slight edge in second serve points and breakpoint saving under pressure, Rame counterbalances this with superior performance in return games and breakpoint conversion.
Tagger's overall win rate in the past year is higher, yet Rame has faced slightly tougher competition by playing against higher-ranked opponents. On clay, both players perform well, but Tagger shows a marginally stronger historical record. However, should the match go down to a deciding set, Rame appears to have a distinct advantage.
Based on these insights, although the match-up is close, Rame is likely to emerge victorious in this encounter, especially if the match becomes lengthy and tactically demanding.
Lilli Tagger vs Alice Rame Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Tagger vs A. Rame H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 11 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:33:12 | Average Match Time | 1:33:12 |
| 61% (69/113) | 1st Serve % | 57% (52/92) |
| 78% (54/69) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (35/52) |
| 48% (21/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (14/40) |
| 73% (8/11) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 47% (43/92) | Return Points Win % | 34% (38/113) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Tagger Recent Matches Played
A. Rame Recent Matches Played

L. Tagger vs A. Rame Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.67% (58/29) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.84% (377/253) |
| 63.59% (124/71) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.37% (823/587) |
| 54.86% (965/794) | Games Win/Loss | 54.36% (6881/5778) |
| 58.82% (10/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.25% (45/35) |
| 70.31% (45/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.66% (304/189) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.12% (28/29) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 131 | Aces Total | 362 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 227 | Total Double Faults | 1238 |
| 1:31:39 | Average Match Time | 1:25:49 |
| 324.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 483.66 |
| 64% (3140/4884) | 1st Serve % | 66% (21588/32712) |
| 62% (1960/3140) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (12557/21588) |
| 49% (851/1744) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (5033/11124) |
| 49% (293/603) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (2420/4693) |
| 46% (2230/4861) | Return Points Win % | 49% (16490/33509) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69.84% (44/19) | Challenger W/L | 57.21% (250/187) |
| 60.00% (12/8) | Futures W/L | 66.15% (127/65) |
| 66% (57/86) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (368/613) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 60% (9/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (48/98) |
| 59% (13/22) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (85/163) |
| 91% (57/52) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (372/326) |
| 9% (57/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (372/44) |
| 20% (30/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (257/46) |